RESUMO
Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic necessitated novel health-care delivery for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), including reduced in-person appointments and physiologic testing to minimize transmission. Clinicians often have been required to rely on patients' subjective assessments of their clinical status during phone follow-up appointments. It is unknown how accurate a patient's self-assessment is compared with that of their physician during an in-person evaluation. Research Question Are patients' self-assessments of their clinical status in agreement with their physicians' assessments, and are telemedicine vs in-person visits acceptable? Study Design and Methods Patients were enrolled prospectively from the University of Calgary ILD clinic. Participants were asked by phone before the in-person appointment and after the appointment to rate their clinical status on a five-point Likert scale. Physicians then rated the patient's clinical status after the appointment on a similar five-point Likert scale, masked to patient responses. Patients and physicians were asked if an in-person appointment was necessary or if telemedicine would have sufficed. Clinical variables associated with physician assessments were assessed. Results Fifty patients with mean age of 67 ± 11.8 years participated. Mean time since last follow-up was 5.0 ± 3.0 months. No correlation was found between the preclinical patient self-assessment and postclinical physician assessment (P = .18;κ = 0.28). Correlation of postclinical assessment was statistically significant (P < .001), with moderate agreement (κ = 0.49). Physicians thought telephone visits were acceptable for 58% of appointments, whereas only 12% of patients preferred telephone visits. Physician's assessment of clinical status seemed to be driven by change in diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (P = .039). Interpretation Telemedicine may improve access to care for patients during pandemic management, in rural communities, and for those with impaired mobility. Despite these benefits, our data support that patients and physicians may not agree on determination of clinical status and that patients generally prefer in-person patient-physician interactions.
RESUMO
Advances in our understanding of interstitial lung disease (ILD) pathophysiology and natural history have led to the development of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of several of these complex diseases. The demographics of patients with ILD indicate the disease is not restricted to older adults. Connective tissue disease-associated ILD, familial pulmonary fibrosis, and post-COVID-19 fibrosis may affect women of child-bearing age. Recent trials have excluded pregnant women, thereby limiting the applicability of contemporary therapeutic advances to these patients. This review synthesizes the current knowledge of pregnancy outcomes in those with ILD, with a focus on connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and potential treatment implications for patients with ILD who are pregnant or considering pregnancy. Pregnancy considerations for patients with ILD include the need for preconception counseling and planning to ensure disease stability, medication and vaccination optimization, and multidisciplinary involvement of a patient's pulmonologist, obstetrician, and, when indicated, rheumatologist and genetic counselor. Evidence to date suggests that women with ILD can have safe and healthy pregnancies but that complications may occur in those with severe ILD.